I do think it’s overkill to have the multi-disk collections listed as seperate entries. However, since Criterion has given the collections spine numbers I think we should leave those collections on this list, because it will be easier to update when there are new releases if the Listsofbests numbers correspond exactly with the numbers on the Criterion spines. This site lsts the releases by spine numbers:
I see Perlle’s point, too, so I will join both lists. It’s just a question of personal preference.
I think it’s fine to make minor changes to public lists, but if you want to make major changes or are getting into fights about the changes it’s probably best to just create a different list and people can pick one or the other or both, and everyone can be peaceful and happy.
I’ve actually softened my view on this. Now that we have an alphabetical list (without duplication of box sets) it does seem that the spine listing should include the box sets for the sake of completeness.