Teitur commented on…

Food from Street Vendors

One of the main reasons of travelers' diarrhea — 2 years ago

Food from street vendors is probably the most risky of all cooked food. The food though once cooked is often kept warm at ideal temperatures for bacterial growth. Also of note is the fact that the people with these stalls usually do not have any clean running water and questionable knowledge of disease prevention. For example it’s just as likely that your food is being prepared for you by someone who’s just come from defecating behind the next corner.

Other fast food is also to be avoided while traveling. This includes fast food joints bearing names also known in the western world, such as McDonald’s. Employees are unskilled and parts of the food are dangerous, such as the uncooked vegetables and the sauces. Apart from that fast food is a killer in itself.

If you stick to boiled and/or fried local food you should be relatively safe.

Check the CDC’s website for more tips and to read up on other factors regarding your health during travels.

Seek more advice at your local travel clinic.

Infections may lead to serious long lasting damage to your digestion.


Comments

DenverGreen
London

Don't agree

I take issue with practically everything in the above post. As someone who likes to think they’ve travelled quite a bit and normally on the cheap, I can say that in my opinion street food is no worse than eating in restaurants and is often safer, better, cheaper and a good introduction to the local culture. If you are smart and go somewhere obviously popular and busy you are virtually guaranteed a great meal at a cheap price.

To assume that workers outside ‘Western’ countries have inferior standards of cleanliness, skill and quality is an assumption of breathtaking arrogance and paranoia. Many street vendors are highly-skilled, scrupulously clean, friendly and consistently produce tasty food. especially as they are well-known in their neighbourhoods and are on view 100% of the time they work,(unlike in restaurants where you never see what goes on in the kitchen). They also take a lot of pride in their food and live and die by their reputation for food as there is heavy competition for the market in countries where street-food is common.

You can generally see what goes into your food and watch it being cooked (normally quickly and at a high temperature which kills off most bacteria). I personally would rather eat a local, traditional food that is cheap and nice rather than an expensive, wasteful meal in a Western restaurant that has a veneer of hygiene only when the health inspectors visit.

(Interestingly I’ve found McDonalds in many ‘non-Western’ countries is an upmarket place to eat and on the few times I tried it, it was nicer than back home.)

I’m not saying that eating street-food is wholly safe – there are bad apples in every industry, but if you can’t tell a good place to eat from a bad one when you can see everything that happens to your food, then maybe you need to educate yourself.

I’d argue that it is not being used to the chemical mixture of the water in that country that causes traveller’s diarrhoea, not street-food.

...

I would just like to point out that most specialists on travel medicine will advise you not to eat street food and that the reasons they give for this advise are not unfounded. Research on this issue and relevant issues has been quite extensive.

As this is posted in a public forum I also feel obliged to challenge your accusation of arrogance. I find it interesting that you disregard the advise of those whose sole job it is to follow the latest research in the field and advise travelers on the issue and then talk about arrogance.

First off I’d like to point out that you almost certainly lack the grounding to form an educated opinion of the matter. Second, that this will ease your way to misguided conceptions of the situations you experience. Third you cannot have conducted any research on the issue nor taken samples of the food in question or your views would be different and fourth:

You are but one man. The results of the research on this issue has come forth through the toil of thousands. Disregarding the work of these people and all others in the field on account of your own rather scant travel experience and knowledge and then accusing those who parley their findings of prejudice, paranoia and arrogance has to be called quite ironic. I would in fact question who should be called arrogant in regard to this matter.

Show a little humility.
These thousands have worked on this for decades. Perhaps they might even “know better” than you.

DenverGreen
London

I’m sorry, you seem to have misunderstood, I am not arguing against peer-reviewed medical research and findings, but the unsubstantiated statements you made in your original unedited post.

While as you kindly point out, I ‘lack the grounding to form an educated opinion of the matter’ (though personally I think its a sign of better education to question everything rather than blankly accept and digest everything you are told), and present my views as opinions, it is wrong to make statements or value judgements that your post suggests are medical facts or from a government organisation.

“For example it’s just as likely that your food is being prepared for you by someone who’s just come from defecating behind the next corner.”

- I’m sorry, I don’t see how this can be scientifically backed up as fact and I find it somewhat offensive of you to make what can only be described as assumptions about foreign peoples.

“Employees are unskilled”

- No researcher would ever make such a qualitive statement, so I feel I must take it as opinion and again I find it offensive.

“Apart from that fast food is a killer in itself.”
- again, not scientific fact.

And in the second post:

“Third you cannot have conducted any research on the issue nor taken samples of the food in question or your views would be different”

- ask anyone with a scientific background and they will tell you that nothing can be proven 100% so how can you assume that if I conducted research on it I would necessarily come to the same conclusions as you?

Also, I would think the fact that I have not experienced traveller’s diarrhoea from eating street food would seem to suggest that the street food I ate did not cause diarrhoea, convincing (to my untrained brain). I guess I must be incredibly lucky or perhaps it’s just my arrogance at daring to eat street food.

Again, I am merely presenting an alternative viewpoint, namely that streetfood can be safe, even safer than a restaurant as you can see the cooking process.

Taking an issue with everything I say is not presenting a viewpoint.

You say that “To assume that workers outside ‘Western’ countries have inferior standards of cleanliness, skill and quality is an assumption of breathtaking arrogance and paranoia”..

Does that not assume that I am assuming something? I am not. I am merely trying to relay some of the research on the matter. I have some knowledge of it since I have worked as an assistant to a specialist in travel medicine for 7 years. I thought this could be of use to other travelers concerned for their health. Note also that I never said anything about any particular area.

Also of note is that I use conditionals in all that I say. I am not for example saying that street food is all bad, what I said was that it has been shown to be the main cause for travelers’ diarrhea. It can be safe and it sure can be tasty. It is true that if you see it fried most germs should be killed, but keep in mind that street food has usually been able to acquire more bacteria to begin with than the comparison. It is a fair target to all that moves about the street and often provides the perfect nesting grounds for bacteria. The frying is often minimal since most often the food is already cooked. Apart from that the fact that these are not approved outlets nor these approved cooks is of matter. The concern is not whether or not they can cook or whether or not what they cook can be quite tasty.. The concern is about public health and safety. Due to a lack of facilities cleanliness is in almost all cases less than in approved restaurants. Let’s take the cleaning out and cleaning up of the trays and implements as an example. If an establishment does not have the manpower to man both cleaning and cooking duties it is likely that the latter will be neglected. If it does not have access to clean water nor boils or heats to at least 70°C (160°F) the water it cleans with, implements will not be clean. If employees have not been educated about microbes and the dangers they can cause the term “cleaning” is likely to refer only to cleaning all that is visible to the eye. If such an establishment also operates on a very low profit-margin it is not unlikely that none of the produce will be thrown away unless completly unsellable.

None of these statements imply anything about any particular establishment.. these are merely things to consider when choosing where to eat.

I never said anything about any area in particular either. When I travel in “the west” I take the same considerations to heart and would recommend others to do so too.

Travelers’ diarrhea is however usually caused by bacteria which are common in one area but less common in another. This is why it is called travelers’ diarrhea and separated from other diarrhea cases. Though you can get diarrhea from your local street vendors you will be less likely to do so than a traveler. Your theory on “the chemical mixture of the water in that country” is interesting, but I’m afraid few specialist will support it.

Travelers’ diarrhea is still not your only concern. I would advise travelers to be especially careful in areas which have dangerous food and waterborne diseases such as Cholera or Typhoid fever. I would also be especially on my guard in any country in which water quality is a problem. To take an example of how bad this can be; India is a good example. In India even some 70% of the bottled water is contaminated.

Now to your points of discontent:

“Employees are unskilled”

In many fast food places such as Mc Donalds the average duration of employment is only about a month or so. This leaves most of the workforce quite inexperienced.

“Apart from that fast food is a killer in itself.”

I will not argue that I have much knowledge of studies done on this matter but I have heard that there is a connection and even a correlation between the eating of fatty food and diseases such as heart-disease and obesity. Eating too fast is also not recommended by dietary specialists and doctors in general.

If you want an example of what fast food can do to you just have a look at the movie Super-Size Me. Though perhaps not the most scientific – It’s a good documentary and I wholly recommend it.

The point about the defecating cook is obviously not to be taken too seriously. This can though, as I pointed out, just as well be. At least you can be sure that the non-existent facilities have not been approved by local health officials.

If you feel so strongly on behalf of these people you have visited why won’t you help their economy a little and spend a little more money on food in their countries?

I know I would. I’d even say that if you have the money to get there you should have the money to spend there.

-Teitur

DenverGreen
London

My interpretation of fast-food is not necessarily fatty food, rather food that you get quickly – for example you can get apples (often from a street-vendor) – i count that as a pretty fast food. If you eat food too quickly and are a grown adult, frankly you are stupid. I have seen Super-size Me (and read Fast-Food Nation before you ask) and though I dislike McDonals etc it can be perfectly healthy if its part of a well-balanced, varied diet as a burger contains meat, vegetables and bread. Super-size Me shows the effects of eating McDonals for every meal, every day for a month. Not exactly a varied diet. My dislike of the chain stems from its lack of individuality. But we digress.

I think regarding the chef, I think its just as likely that the chef in your restaurant has been to the toilet and not washed his hands afterwards. I’ve worked in restaurant and the chefs rarely if ever washed their hands. I’d recommend Anthony Bourdain’s book ‘Kitchen Confidential: Adventures in the Culinary Underbelly’ to find out what chefs are like and kitchens behind the scenes. Ask anyone who’s worked in the restaurant business and they’ll have some stories. And this is despite health officials. So I’d rather have something fresh cooked for me by someone I can see than something that could have been dropped on the floor then put back on my plate for I get it. to say nothing of how its been stored.

As for the water, the website you point to indicates water to be equally high with food so I don’t really see that the restaurant is getting particularly cleaner water than a street vendor. As you point out, even bottled water can be unsafe.

As for why I don’t spend more money in the places I go to, I tend to spend long periods of time so it tends to be too expensive to eat in a restaurant every day. Aside from the fact that it feels pretty obscene to eat in a fancy restaurant when people are dying of malnourishment and starvation. Plus, I find street food more ethnically diverse in its output than restaurants which tend to be similar fare around the world. I can talk to the other customers or the owner/seller who are more likely to be local people and find out about their life, culture etc. In addition, I’d rather the money I spend goes into the hands of someone living more humbly than a wealthy restaurant owner who probably has more than one business anyway.

I don’t think the answer to the world’s problems is simply to throw money at them. As well as being degrading, it builds an unhealthy relationship where poorer poorer people/countries become dependent on the handouts of wealthy ones. It would be better to reduce barriers of entry in our own countries allowing these poorer countries to trade with us.

I am genuinely saddened that you are missing out on street food when you travel by only eating in restaurants.

I agree

In the post above there are many things I agree with.

I could completely echo your points on fast food and would like to add that fruit you peel yourself is some of the safest food you can get1,2. Personally I can say that I almost hate McDonalds but I also recognize that the very thing that makes you despise them is what often brings you in. In extended stays in foreign parts of the world anything with which you have a little bit of familiarity may relieve your travel stress and give you some sense of safety in this perhaps otherwise strange environment. Even though you know it’s dirt you’ll say to yourself phrases like – “it’s dirt I know” and “it’s just like home, they don’t even speak English :) ”. But therein lies the problem, it’s not quite like home though it may appear so. At a microbial level the world looks quite different and your gut might well notice.. :-/

It is true that kitchens will never be “clean” but there are degrees of cleanliness which one should consider.

Safest is to eat in the homes of locals or to cook oneself and second safest is to eat in local restaurants.

Eating in “western style” restaurants may be safe but personally I would not recommend it unless that is the local cuisine – as I thought I had mentioned before. Fast food is generally not recommended and street food is definitely not recommended. Uncooked food such as salads probably pose the greatest threat. Foods which have been cooked a long time ago can also well be just as risky.

When I travel I only go to what to my best knowledge are local restaurants. Usually these are the smaller ones as I usually have to travel on a budget. That is when I am not lucky enough to stay with a local and am also not cooking for myself.

I have a deep desire for exploration and it usually pushes me to rather stay longer than in greater luxury. I still believe this should be done within reason. When traveling in areas where life is cheaper or public safety generally less it is important to realize that what to the general public may be acceptable risks and losses might not be such to you.

Levels of water contamination vary greatly between areas in the world. As with food, boiled water is the safest to drink. Non-dehydrating hot drinks may be a good option for the wary traveler. This would include low caffeine teas such as herbal teas and white or green tea. Bottled and sealed water is also usually safe. In areas where forgery and foul play are common it is advisable only to buy your water in places you think are unlikely to be caught up in it (have solid and trustworthy supply lines and/or reputations to keep for example).

As for the supposed ethicality of eating in the street, I’m not quite sure this fits with the support you say you want to show in the development of the countries you visit. I still want to note that I’m not only talking about developing countries and that these general principles should apply to someone who’s come from a long way away to visit a country such as England as well.

By not eating in the often humble local restaurants and supporting what is often their main competition, the local street food, you are likely to be strengthening the black economy and with that undermining the local economy and government. This may all be well if you are totally cynical about it all – but one thing is certain and that is that without it’s income (taxes) it is unlikely the state will be to be able to assert it’s power and even less likely to divert funds to development. Strengthening the black economy of a country is also not the way to help it in it’s fight against corruption and lawlessness. Your support of unregulated eateries is also not likely to help build up standards of public health and safety in the country. Apart from that a big black economy within an economy is one of the biggest problems an economy can face. It’s effects are many and diverse but it can for example severely undermine fiscal institutions, encourage unlawful fiscal groups and practices, crime, corruption and even a paralyzation of the central bank, which may in turn cause runaway inflation and other chaotic behavior. On top of that it undermines labor and safety. All of this may still be taken with a grain of salt, since I’m no economist.

I’d also like to say that the obscenity you experience in a restaurant may well be the obscenity intrinsic in your presence in the country. You have traveled half the world to be there and you will leave these people behind. All of this you do by your own choice, a choice they may not have, and because of your own status as a part of the cream of capitalism, most likely bought with their blood. At the same time your travels rob all our children of their future by aiding in creating an unlivable atmosphere.

Perhaps we need to feel the obscenity of it.

As I said before; if you have the money to travel there…

.


1 – Apples and other fruit eaten without peeling can put one in harms way.

2 – Melons and similar fruit in certain parts of the world can be dangerous as they are sometimes weighted by injecting them with water, which often is contaminated. This is especially widespread in Northern Africa.

DenverGreen
London

Depends how you do it I guess. I don’t own a car and only ever take public transport so maybe that helps to some extent to offset the pollution caused by my plane journeys.

Also, I agree about the obscenity, I just find I’d rather eat like the local people do (and I would include the occasional meal in a local restaurant in this as well as street food). Seeing people living in real poverty helps me to live more simply at home and appreciate what I’ve got and how lucky I am. It also makes me less ignorant of the world. This year I spent 5 months studying in Morocco this year and without that I wouldn’t have learnt so much about Muslims, Islamic traditions, beliefs and ways of life, challenging the assumptions I had before I went. I firmly believe that if the world travels and explores itself then communication will increase and be easier and there will be fewer misunderstandings. This, in my opinion is worth the pollution costs caused by travelling.

As for supporting the black economy, I’m not sure that this is the case. Are you really sure that the street vendor is illegal? It’s a big generalisation to make, in England for instance the vendors must have a license and pay taxes (and for that matter are inspected by health officials just like restaurants). As for taxes, a large percentage goes to defence budgets – I’m not sure many people around the world would want to be supporting the British government’s defence budget at present. Some of the countries I’ve been to have undemocratic regimes where large proportions of state funds are appropriated by their leaders for personal gain. In this case, if all the money from buying a meal goes into the pocket of the vendor – great. In many places street food is an intrinsic part of the culture

With regards to safety, I’m becoming increasingly sick of living in a sanitised country overrun by regulations and culture afraid of anything. The less we experience any form of bacteria the more susceptible we are to diseases and the lower our immune system gets (we could live all our life in a safe bubble at home but we’d die the second we leave it). Now don’t get me wrong, I don’t want to eat unsafely, but I’d rather that I build up my own judgement and senses on what is safe than have an official do it.

If something looks off I don’t eat, if it smells off I don’t eat, in fact if the place is not busy with people and the food has a quick turnover I’m not going to eat there. I find this rule works for me the world over, especially so at home.

Sounds quite reasonable

Your own judgment and immune system are of course your first line of defense

You can also probably rather afford getting sick than someone who’s staying for a shorter time. For someone who’s only staying for a week or even less getting diarrhea for a couple of days might well ruin most of his trip for him/her. Not to mention the inconvenience of such bowel movements if one wants to travel around.. let’s say in a bus for example!

It is also true that if you have the time to adjust to the local flora you will be less susceptible to getting the common infections of the area. I’d still try to introduce them to my gut gradually rather than in one go though.. no need to rush into things and shock the system ;-)

It’s still important that travelers recognize that some infections/attacks are worse than others and that they need to seek medical attention if they fear their system is not handling the infection. If you spot warning-signs such as a high fever, abdominal pain or blood in your diarrhea you should seek medical attention immediately. As always one should watch out to keep oneself hydrated and to make up for the loss of fluids. At your local travel-health clinic you can get advice as to what to do in such circumstances. They may also be able to provide you with a list of contacts in the country you intend to stay in. Do use this service if it is available to you. Medical service can wary greatly.

Note that though you may well build up a relative immunity to some of the more common diseases it may well be that you will not be able to build up an immunity to others. Engaging in risky behavior is therefore not recommended unless one can spare time for the treatment of the disease. Diseases brought back to your friends and family, who do not have any of the immunity you may have gained, are also perhaps not the nicest presents you can bring them ;-)

Note also that you can get vaccinated against diseases such as Typhoid fever and Cholera and that the Cholera vaccine (Dukoral) also includes a temporary defense against some common attacks on the digestive system.


I’m all for traveling of course. Especially traveling which includes plenty of positive interaction with locals. As you say, we need to learn of and try to understand each other and to create positive and respectful relationships between cultures. To do this I also think one should avoid and oppose the nihilistic “post-modern” relativism that seems to be plaguing many.

I’m not a big fan of flying though and urge all to rather sail and take trains as much as they can and also to rather take longer trips than shorter if they can manage. This is still often not a popular plea with travelers and some may even plainly deny that they do any harm. Such would not fit with their self image you see ;-)

Others of course just refuse to reflect on it and “defend” themselves with the quite sociopathic statement that “it’s no one else’s business what they do”...

As to the legality of street business.. this is varied across the world but generally it is some of the last business to get regulated. Therefore in the more developed countries you’ll find that these business are indeed watched but in most of the world they are generally not watched or only a part of them are.

If it weren’t for that fact that giving the business owner an uncut price for his product works against national unity this would be a fine thing to do, but it does breed a more unjust system. It favors entrepreneurship over other forms of work and especially disfavors labor. Without a strong and just tax system a social welfare system will likely not be built and those who do not receive such black payments will suffer. The commonness of black transactions increases the public support of them and the public tolerance of corruption and unlawfulness.

Though a tool such as the state is often misused I find it cynical to dismiss it’s need on that basis. If there is to be justice in an area unity is important. The state is what can bring it. Though defense budgets may be connected to how democratic and just societies are they are still mostly an unconnected issue.

I’d say the same applies to other forms of government and organization.

-May there be justice in your life!

-Good travels!

& – Good health!

rangutan
München

Very interesting discussion!

A very interesting discussion with important points from both of you. I do not intend reviving an argument but wish to add:

I have travelled through 54 nations mainly in Africa and South America and have no specific problems with diarrhea. This might be because I started travelling with my parents when I was still a toddler and we hosted international visitors often at home. I have become immune? I will anyway avoid disaster areas and where warnings of water borne diseases are announced.

One must also remember that we transport our own 1st world diseases to remote areas of the globe by spiting, sneezing or touching things, often causing epidemics!

Trivia: Diarrhea is not only the result of bacterial toxins but mainly due to viral infection. Intake is also through moisture in the air then swallowed by spit.

Trivia: Diarrhea is one of the main causes of infant deaths in the 3rd world because of resulting dehydration!

Trivia: The Latin American version is called “Montezuma’s Revenge”. Local people and experienced travellers enjoy immunity!

Tip: anyone afraid of the dangers of travelling should stay at home in an oxygene tent?

Good that someone read it ;-)

It might be as you say that you have some immunity to some of the infectious agents in question but the strains mutate quite fast and immunity against these often doesn’t last for very long, take the immune response and mutations of diseases such as the common cold or influenza as a comparison.

I find it more likely that you just learnt some good travel habits from your parents ;-)

You are right about the viral causes of most diarrhea episodes, I’m not sure I did not mention this but in any case I usually talk quite generally about infections. These can include fungal- and viral infections as well.

The general guidelines regarding food do not change with their inclusion. The longer food is cooked and the higher the temperature it’s cooked at the safer it should be. The original state of the food can increase or lessen the cooking required for the food to be safe.

I’d also like to add that protozoa and small creatures can be taken up through food and drink as well and that these can have higher resistances to heat than other agents. Giving further reason to stick with well cooked food.

As with other agents these also have different ways of entering your system. Some can even bury in through your skin, making waters they inhabit unsafe for bathing in..

As it’s not possible to discuss all possible ways of catching diseases with travelers most attention is, and should be, payed to the greatest and most avoidable dangers. Stray airborne particles cause a much smaller risk to travelers than food- and waterborne particles.

Stray airborne particles are also almost impossible to avoid. In areas where air pollution is also a problem though you might consider wearing a simple mask for your own comfort.

People also usually know enough to avoid those who are sneezing or otherwise seem to have something which might be infectious.

It’s indeed noteworthy also that deceases travel both ways with travelers, and that these are general principles as I mentioned before. Jared Diamond’s book “Guns, Germs, and Steel” is an interesting read in connection to this for example.

And finally, regarding the dramatic possibilities often put up by people of a very set mind, I’d just like to say that the world is not very simple and it doesn’t help to think of it in simple terms ;-)

There are many responses to danger which are both popular and can’t stand up to inspection. Being in denial of reality, deciding to ignore it or cowering in fear of it are all either immature or not fully thought through responses. Also, though ignorance can be bliss it usually isn’t in hindsight ;-)

Learning of that you could have easily avoided something which has caused you great discomfort is usually not such a nice thing ;-)

I’d just say that by learning of the world you can prepare for it and armed with this preparation you can experience it and enjoy it to the fullest!

Happiness through enlightenment!

Happy new year!

rangutan
München

A good Strategy!

“Prevention better than cure” they say and your strategy is certainly the best. Thanks! RRG