The Washington Post's "10 Best of the Year: 2006"

Nice list, but why are there so many books on it if it’s ten best?

Mar 09, 04:53AM | 3 comments

Rory M
New Jersey

I think it’s because it’s a community list. Other people keep adding books that weren’t there originally.

Sep 01, 12:21PM | Respond to this

Yeah, that’s what I thought at first, too, but the person who created the list is the only contributor! It looks like she added all 100 herself…

Sep 01, 01:04PM | Respond to this

Rory M
New Jersey

Huh. Very odd.

Sep 01, 04:06PM | Respond to this